Sunday, October 21, 2012

Cambodia's monarchy will not go anywhere as long as Hun Xen is alive, however ... nobody lives eternally

Dancing off the stage?

Politics and the monarchy after the death of ex-King Norodom Sihanouk

Oct 20th 2012 | PHNOM PENH
The economist
Will King Sihamoni now develop a political voice of his own and speak out for a beleaguered peasantry? If he succeeds at this then he may become a king revered in his own right. As it happens though, he is unmarried and without heir. The possibility remains that the centuries-old Cambodian monarchy may turn into an irrelevance—or even come to an end.
SINCE his coronation in 2004 Cambodia’s king, Norodom Sihamoni, has enjoyed a quiet life, sticking to his constitutional role as a monarch who reigns but does not rule. He opens festivals and oversees Buddhist ceremonies, serving as a spiritual crutch for his people.

Always in the background, however, was his father, Norodom Sihanouk, who died in Beijing on October 15th at the age of 89 (see article). Sihanouk abdicated to make way for the 13th of his 14 known children from seven marriages. He tapped Sihamoni, once a ballet dancer and teacher, largely out of concern for his wife, Monique. The ageing king was acutely aware that his last wife, 14 years his junior, would outlive him. Her fondness for Sihamoni tipped the balance.

Sihanouk continued to be revered right up to his death. Images of Sihamoni in shops and offices throughout Cambodia invariably portray the king with his parents. In contrast to his unobtrusive son, Sihanouk was an intensely political animal, unafraid to meddle in domestic or regional politics when he thought it was needed—often with tragic consequences. It was an unconventional role, especially compared with other contemporary monarchs. But then as the person who had won Cambodia’s independence from the French in 1953, Sihanouk was confident of his special place in his country’s history.


His relationship with the long-serving prime minister, the authoritarian Hun Sen, was particularly prickly. On the one hand in 1993 Sihanouk bestowed upon Mr Hun Sen the title Samdech, which has royal connotations. Speculation has persisted ever since that Mr Hun Sen sees himself and his family as enjoying a similar destiny to that of the monarchy: idolised by many Cambodians, especially in the countryside, as semi-divine. On the other hand Sihanouk refused to be intimidated by the prime minister, and often complained that the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) had turned his country into a nation of beggars, dependent on foreign donors for handouts. He routinely published his thoughts, usually in French and latterly online, and fancied himself as a political counterweight to a government he regarded as overbearing.

Now that Sihanouk has gone, however, the reluctance of 59-year-old King Sihamoni to enter the political fray might begin to cost the monarchy dear. For the country’s “children”, as Sihanouk used to call his countrymen, are being subjected to an unprecedented social upheaval about which Sihamoni has so far had little to say. Traditional Cambodian patterns of village life are fast disappearing, and often for the worst reasons. The government has forcibly evicted hundreds of thousands from their land in order to sell it off, often to foreign speculators. This “land grab” policy has enriched the well-connected in government and their business friends, but is widely condemned both at home and abroad.

Over the past year environmentalists, journalists and ordinary villagers protesting against the government’s policies have been jailed, shot at and, in some cases, killed amid confrontations with the police and the army. A crackdown on dissent, particularly in the Khmer-language press, has been harsh. The political opposition has been relentlessly hounded and bullied, although its own divisions have also detracted from its effectiveness.

Will King Sihamoni now develop a political voice of his own and speak out for a beleaguered peasantry? If he succeeds at this then he may become a king revered in his own right. As it happens though, he is unmarried and without heir. The possibility remains that the centuries-old Cambodian monarchy may turn into an irrelevance—or even come to an end.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

It is very sad for King Sihamoni. He is alone among the tough former communist powerful man (men) whose interests are not about preserving the monarchy, but to preserve and consolidate their own power and wealth.

It is the legacy of his father, the circumstance and tragedy of the country. I personally would advise him to do what ever would make his heart content, to live outside the big shadow of his late father. Hope he has the strength ans courage to move on and be himself.

May God and the spirit of tthe late King Norodom Sihanouk look after King Sihamoni and his Queen Mother.

Anonymous said...

The article is right. It is just a matter of time that the centuries-old Cambodian monarchy will turn into an irrelevance or even come to an end as it has started to die from within for some time and the royals of Cambodia including His majesty have nobody else to blame, but themselves.

Courage is antecedent to long-term vision which decides present action and present action brings about desired future. One has to be willing to die in order to live. Without courage we have started to die a shameful death from within.

King Sihamoni has chosen to have the existence of his monarchy defended not by the citizens of the country whom he claims to love and protect, but by the strongman of Cambodia who has recently professed again to defend it at all cost in front of the dead body of King Father Norodom Sihanouk.

His Majesty has lost the very powerful and irreplaceable connection to His subjects by refusing to speak up on the behalf of the poor people. They are the true defenders of the monarchy if the monarchy can show itself to be relevant in their lives!

Imagine what it would be like as far as the King's reputation goes, had His Majesty come out in strong protest of the filling in of the Boeung Kak natural lake and defended the rights of the poor by threatening to abdicate the throne if His concern of the environment and justice were not addressed by the government of PM Hun Sen.

Though His monarchy may be abolished by the CPP of Hun Sen as a result of His protest, it will live forever in the heart and mind of many Cambodians and history. He might even win the respect of the CPP including PM Hun Sen as well. In addition, the CPP would have a lot to lose by allowing the abdication to proceed. The CPP may make a deal! It is too bad His Majesty has made it so easy for PM Hun Sen to reward his cronies at the expense of the majority of poor Cambodians.

Choosing to remain silent has kept the physical being of monarchy alive, but rid its body of its very meaningful soul that represents the purpose of its existence.

Is it too late now to act? It is rather late, but certainly not too late and His Majesty would have to decide for himself how He wants to be remembered. Perhaps He should not listen anymore to his useless royal advisors whose advices are not for His interests but certainly for theirs. After all, the recent Cambodian royals have not achieved or done anything much for the country anyway. They are unnecessary burdens for the country.

Pissed Off

Anonymous said...

Sihamony is a coward and he will die as a coward, just like his dad.
His dad have ample of times to speak out for his people before his death, but decided to take with him to the grave. A selfish and a stubborn man.
Cambodian shouldn't expect any positive result from Sihamony.
He will sit and bark when he was told to do so. That's all that he will do.
If he do anything other than what I've mentioned, then I will kill myself.
Hell, he might do what his dad does, abandon his people altogether.

Anonymous said...

Hun Sen should marry one of his daughters to the King to form a blood alliance, thus connecting his family to the royal line. If he succeeds, he would accomplish what few had accomplished in the history of the world, in that, he has gone from a poor country boy, to become the most powerful figure in Cambodia, more powerful than the king himself, and with an established connection to the royal family, he could set out to slowly remove the Sihanouk family line and replace it with his own, his family will rule Cambodia forever. It will make for a legendary story, worthy of a blockbuster movie.

Anonymous said...

Right now, we are living in the 21st century and I agree with Piss off, I don't think having monarchy is relevent anymore, since the death of 3 millions plus a whole country and nation in ruined.

E.g In china, in the 1900s, we called it the 'last emperior', when the nationalists and communists found out that, having monarchy would do more harm than good, e.g 'things they should learn but not and just because his father was king, doesn't mean the son is, unless he is well educated one too'. I

n addition, overseeing that having thousand of concubines and the ability to kill whoever he likes is just insant.

In this sense, they had to eliminate their monarchy for good. Yatsun (father of the nationalist) said, 'if China wants to have a strong race we have to eliminate the emperial system for good'.

They believed that having monarch would divide people among people, back then, their people were being intoxicated of using drug called 'opuim' and they were no longer themselves. In conclusion, it shows that our khmer monarchy is no different from those of the China's.

Sadly, khmers are far behind the Chinese ideology and would learn nothing from history of civilisation. In this sense, what we need now is to ask Chinese to talk to the VC to leave us khmer alone as well as asked them to return all khmerland and islands etc.

My other concern is, maybe Chinese already made a deal with VC e.g to let them have part of Vietnam and one of viets' islands and in return, VC would take Kos Tral and other khmers' island. If so, we are in the deep shit and there is nothing we or the international community can do about it.

3 million souls

Anonymous said...

Why PM did not promise to the body of the King Father that he will protect Khmer Nation, territory, islands, mainland, and the people? Why he promised to protect throne, queen, king and monarchy only? No one willtake them away if PM will not do.

Anonymous said...

12:14 PM,

What a wistful thinking of having China coercing the vietcong to leave Cambodia alone! The US and the vietcong are attempting political and military intercourse at this very moment! So, yes the vc will surely be coerced by China.

The chinese and cambodian should worry about the vc becoming too big for all of southeast asia. All of the balance in the region will profoundly change if the vc grew too big and strong.

It is to no Asean's other countries and china's benefit to have a viet dominated indochina, allying with Uncle Sam. And it is a huge gambling for Uncle Sam to fall head over heel with the seduction of Uncle Ho's daughter.

Anonymous said...

The other scenario is that the vc and the chinese become allies, which gurantees also the instability and upset of balance in the region. The current status quo is the best possible scenario.

Anonymous said...

Oh yeah, HIN SEN should marry his wife BUN RANNY TO SIHAMONI TO stick whatever.lolz

Anonymous said...

Two idiot and two evil people.